![]() XUL interface can be user customized via the use of themes (which can reposition and skin controls). On Premises, Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)/Online Partial, several methods (from weak to strong) described in Protecting the contents of the profile No, but supported via ExQuilla for Microsoft Exchange, DavMail add-on or How to connect Thunderbird to Microsoft Exchange MAPI (Microsoft Exchange server protocol) Lacks per-paragraph direction and charset auto-detection capabilities and charset error correction support Better but incomplete support using the BiDi Mail UI extension, including most advanced features Outlook lacks)Īll fundamental functionality supported out of the box for HTML mail, not for plain text. Mediocre support under the hood, but mostly unexposed by default. ![]() Officially available as native 64-bit application on OSīi-diectional text support (eg. Supported, but requires additional purchase of language packs / download of local LIPs ost) ġ00 languages (59 fully localized and 41 partially localized)ĩ6 languages (60 main languages for purchase, 44 more languages (in total 60) from Language Interface Packs (LIPs) for free download) Ĭhanging language of the user interface on the fly Supports one large file ( mbox ) per mailbox and file per message ( Maildir ) Windows 7, 8, 10 Windows Server 2008 R2 Ĭomplex ecosystem of over 1,200 valuable add-ons MacOS, Windows (based on different code bases ) Sharing a profile between different operating systems Portable version that runs on USB flash disks (without installation) No, proprietary and closed-source software No, proprietary software plus additional charges for language packs Microsoft Outlook Major Feature Differences General Personal Information Managers: Mozilla Thunderbird vs. This table is a compilation by users and not an official document by the Document Foundation or by the Mozilla Foundation. The feature comparison table is work in progress and currently incomplete. The comparison highlights differences and therefore does not display any features which are present in both PIM programs. This table separates major and minor feature differences and also includes notes on Thunderbird add-ons. Please note that neither the LibreOffice developer team nor the Document Foundation gives any official recommendation for a PIM software replacement for LibreOffice. There are alternatives to Mozilla Thunderbird available, such as Evolution and Kontact. Like LibreOffice, Thunderbird is a free, open-source, cross-platform program. Mozilla Thunderbird is a fully-featured PIM tool. This comparison table has the objective to assist users in this search. LibreOffice does not have a PIM module and therefore users looking for a suitable PIM software need to seek alternatives for email, calendars, contacts, tasks, and chat features. This page compares the features of Mozilla Thunderbird 60 ( download) and Microsoft Outlook 2019. MS Office, see here: Feature Comparison: LibreOffice - Microsoft Office. If you want to see the comparison of LibreOffice suite vs. More recent information is available on this page. This page was marked as inactive and is retained for historical reference.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |